Comment on Is this just how it’s gonna be till Election Day?

• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  And I just don’t think that’s happening. Science moved away from race long before it was cool. The first steps happened over a century ago; Hitler was already doing pseudoscience. (I guess there is actually something to add)

  source

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Science moved away from phrenology, but we’re not going around claiming that skulls are a social construct. It’s ridiculous.

    source

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Pherenotypes are a social construct. Skulls and variation within them exist. Ditto for human biological variation in other things. You can call that race, but nobody else thinks of Senogambia when you say the milk drinking race.

      Sorry if I came off as a little abrasive there, that wasn’t my intention, I was basically just saying we should agree to disagree at some point.

      source

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I was basically just saying we should agree to disagree at some point.

        I’m afraid I can’t settle for that. This idea that race is some made up thing is offensive to me. I have to correct people who say they agree with it.

        You can call that race, but nobody else thinks of Senogambia when you say “the milk drinking race”,

        There it is. That’s actually what this entire discussion turns on, every time I have it. First, I have to get the other person to admit that inherited physical characteristics exist, which can be a chore for some people. Then, when they admit that, they say some variation of “but that’s not the definition of race / that’s not what people mean when they say race”.

        This is actually the more important thing that you have to shake loose of. Certain academic institutions claim this, but they are overwhelmingly wrong. When people talk about race, they do not talk about some vague abstraction. They almost always are referring to specific inherited characteristics usually tied to the physical place a person’s ancestral group is from.

        The irony is, the only people who could be operating under the delusion that when people talk about race they’re referring to some vague social thing are people who don’t interact with a lot of different people. This idea that race is a social construct is quarantined to one very specific social stratum, because anyone who gets more worldly experience very quickly realizes it’s bunk.

        It’s pretty intuitive when once you realize it. It’s very basic, very “what you see is what you get”. When people talk about race, they talk about the very surface-level, most obvious, simplest definition. No deeper meaning. People are not subconsciously philosophizing. People are not closet racial supremacists. They’re just describing what they see. “Inherited physical characteristics” is the simplest definition of race, and trying to find some deeper meaning of the term is a red herring.

        To go back to the phrenology example, the existence of race does not require bigotry. Which is probably why academia came up with this absurd idea, they were scared of bigotry. The existence of skulls does not require phrenology to be true. It’s bunk, and it’s racist.

        Racism is bullshit.

        Race exists.

        source

        • -> View More Comments