Comment

Comment on Opinion: Increasing the minimum wage comes at too high a price for workers | CNN

BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Because politics is just as much about cooperation as it is about getting as much passed as you want.

What you’re leaving out is the veto-proof majority he had was a result of compromises due to opposition from Southern States and previous attempts at similar bills being struck down by the Supreme Court.

$0.25 is more than half of the AFL backed $0.40 figure you gave, so considering he had to compromise to appeal to the minority AND Supreme Court it’s actually not a bad floor.

Once again, just because it wasn’t the ideal amount on day 1 doesn’t mean the original intent was a lie.

source

Sort:hotnew top

jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Then why was he able to get it to $0.30 a year later or $0.40 in 1945?

You still have not provided any supporting evidence that the minimum wage was intended to be a living wage, all you have is some guy said it so it must be true.

source
- BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  
  Then why was he able to get it to $0.30 a year later or $0.40 in 1945?
  
  Because negotiations can happen with any new legislation, and the US votes every 2 years for elect or re-elect members of congress. Therefore the political landscape can vary greatly within a 2 year span. There are 7 years between 1938 and 1945.
  
  This is a great example of why we need better education in this country.
  
  source
  - jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    Because negotiations can happen with any new legislation, and the US votes every 2 years to elect or re-elect members of congress. Therefore the political landscape can vary greatly within a 2 year span and it can be easier or harder with each congress to pass or amend certain laws. There are 7 years between 1938 and 1945, enough time for the political landscape to change multiple times.
    
    This is a great example of why we need better education in this country. This is some constitution 101 shit.
    
    I’m always impressed when ignorant people pretend they are experts. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 set minimum wage for 1938, 1939, and 1945.
    
    And yes, I provided a direct quote from FDR saying as much. You just didn’t like it. We back to circling around things you don’t want to accept, Jimbo?
    
    I haven’t circled back just noted that your only evidence that minimum wage was intended to be a living wage was from a claim by slimy politician and that you can’t provide any evidence to support his claim.
    
    source
    BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Look man, I’m here to have actual discussions. But we can’t do that when you flat out refuse to accept any source you don’t like.
    
    I provided you with direct quotes from FDR himself, The DOL, and another user provided additional proof to refute your original comment on this thread about the original intent of minimum wage.
    
    As stubborn as you continue to be, you’re not right on this one. The sooner you accept how to be wrong, the sooner you can grow as a person and we can have a real discussion here.
    
    The Fiat Labor Standards Act of 1938 set minimum wage for 1938, 1939, and 1945.
    
    Newsflash, Jimbo: it’s always done that. That’s how laws work. Until repealed they remain valid.
    
    I haven’t circled back just noted that your only evidence that minimum wage was intended to be a living wage was from a claim by slimy politician and that you can’t provide any evidence to support his claim.
    
    I already addressed the evidence I did provide which you’re stubbornly ignoring like a child refusing to eat their vegetables, so I’m going to skip right past that and laugh at the fact that you just called FDR , the only president to have been elected 4x as slimy. 😂
    
    Please continue the meltdown. It is hilarious.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments