Comment on Alexa had “no profit timeline,” cost Amazon $25 billion in 4 years
EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month agoIt’s a good thing their reason is explained very clearly in the article under which we are currently discussing. They believed Alexa would have a high “downstream impact”, i.e.generate sales or subscriptions elsewhere in the company. Which it has so far failed to do.
radivojevic@discuss.online 1 month ago
Amazon wants the loss to avoid paying taxes. They would never admit it is doing well collecting data.
EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Can you explain to me exactly how moving where profit is recorded from one division to another in the same organization reduces their tax burden? Because, excuse me, I know I only did a year or two of accounting courses before dropping the degree, but that’s not how I understand taxes to work.
Also to be turning a profit by “doing well collecting data”, the open market value of the data Alexa alone annually generates would need to be around 8% of the entire global data market. If you can justify how millions of instances of “Alexa set a timer for 10 minutes”, “Alexa what is the weather”, or “Alexa play despacito” generates that much value, maybe you have a point.
radivojevic@discuss.online 1 month ago
“Excuse me”
You seem pretty agitated, and I don’t want to engage with you if you’re going to be impolite.
EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Yeah well, apologies for being a little sassy, but I’m not exactly a big fan of your tone either.