I have read it's likely South Africa has already seen a majority of the population infected at least once. A vaccine is to be preferred (prevention of death and long term consequences), but I think natural immunization in those countries will inevitably be faster than any vaccination programme could be carried out and it might be just as good in the picture of "ending" the pandemic.
pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
It's not just avoiding damage to individuals. Each new infected person means billions of new copies of the virus, each with a chance of mutating and causing a new variant. Until we see the end of a continent being left as a human petri dish, we're just going to be seeing more and more variants.
HamsterDeveloper@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
Do you think natural immunization is inferior to vaccines in terms of preventing future new variants? (not talking about variants that come into existence during the immunization process)
pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
No idea, but that's inconsequential. Immunization via infection just provides a chance for a new variant, and people can be infected multiple times. Immunization via vaccines does not have that risk.