“All”? If you can’t even get all dentists to agree you should use toothpaste, I doubt it
rusticus@lemm.ee 10 months ago
It’s a good question - all Constitutional scholars agree he has violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and is therefore ineligible to hold any political office (www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/…/675048/) but does America have the collective strength to admit it?
AA5B@lemmy.world 10 months ago
rusticus@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Did you read the link or is that too onerous for you?
sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 months ago
odds are he will be
themajesticdodo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This answer doesn’t address the question. Did you comment on the wrong post or are you just generally always this confused?
nxdefiant@startrek.website 10 months ago
The laws for who goes on the ballot are set by the individual states.
I suppose the Federal Election Committee could deny his federal application, or the Attorney General of the U.S. could sue the FEC to force an injunction against his filing under the 14th? It’s not clear.
In any case, regardless of how it got there, it would end up in court and be decided by the Supreme Court, which is ultra conservative right now.
rusticus@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Bla bla bla.
It’s not unambiguous. You either follow the Constitution or you are a traitor to it.
nxdefiant@startrek.website 10 months ago
I’m literally describing to you how that process works. It doesn’t matter by what avenue it happens, it’ll absolutely end up in front of the supreme Court, and then they’ll get to decide to agree with whatever decision was come to or reverse it.
Gadg8eer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Unless they have a reason to lock him up to protect their own interests, the Supreme Court is probably not going to do shit. That’s WHY Trump picked them, as an “insurance measure”, and unfortunately it seems to be working.