Comment on EXCLUSIVE: Cal State"Gender" Academic Inspired Pedophilic Fantasy On Castrating, Enslaving Young Boys - Reduxx

• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Which claims specifically?

  source

  • BananaSpike@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    How about this? “WPATH removed lower age limits in SOC8 while consulting with child castration fetishists”

    source

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That single statement contains 1 claim:

      WPATH removed lower age limits in SOC8.

      This is true.

      It also contains another claim:

      They did this while consulting with child castration fetishists.

      Based on the article provided, it appears to be true. If that’s the case then I think most sane people would agree they should not consult with them anymore, and revisit any influence they might have had on policy.

      Having said that, gender-affirming care has been shown to be a net positive to individuals and society as a whole, so I’m not sure if you’re then trying to go the next step and discredit that in general as a result of this, because that’s how the article reads and is a separate discussion entirely.

      source

      • BananaSpike@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This is the sort of useful conversation I was looking to have. I think we’re in agreement. In another comment, I wrote this:

        WPATH should clean house and purge all pedophiles, retract SOC 8, publish an apology, and write a new version that doesn’t have input from known pedophiles.

        Which might not be how you would phrase it, but largely agrees with:

        If that’s the case then I think most sane people would agree they should not consult with them anymore, and revisit any influence they might have had on policy.

        source