Comment on Neil deGrasse Tyson reads his peer review of Terrence Howard's mathematics theories
undefinedValue@programming.dev 4 months agoNot a fan of Joe Rogan but I did watch clips of his interview with Neil and prick definitely seemed like an appropriate term for him after that. Watch the clips if you don’t believe me.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I watched them. There’s nothing there that is aggressive at all. He very clearly laid out and explained the issues with the ideas put forth by the ideas in that paper, and explicitly said why he did it that way (that’s how a colleague in science would note things), and further said if you’re to be taken seriously, you should expect such feedback from peers who are reviewing your work. That’s quite accurate.
What was your take on this that sounds negative?
undefinedValue@programming.dev 4 months ago
He interrupted Joe constantly and came off as arrogant, condescending and abrasive.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Oh no…Joe Rogan gets interrupted by a certified genius in between idiotic thoughts.
undefinedValue@programming.dev 4 months ago
Hmm, so you’re now arguing in bad faith, that took a turn. I’m officially out as you seem to think it’s OK to be rude and condescend if you’re a “certified genius”. I must be speaking with a certified genius here, I had no idea.