Comment on Sony Considers “St. Elmo’s Fire” Sequel
Stereotype_Be@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I’m not automatically against sequels, but do we really need a sequel to a 40 year old movie?
Comment on Sony Considers “St. Elmo’s Fire” Sequel
Stereotype_Be@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I’m not automatically against sequels, but do we really need a sequel to a 40 year old movie?
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Idk, which is worse a remake or a delayed sequel? Or are they both on the same level?
Stereotype_Be@lemm.ee 4 months ago
That’s a good question. I think I’ll take a sequel 40 years later over an awful remake that’s bound to change a lot of the original story.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I think you’re right. As an example there’s the Paul Rudd Ghostbusters movies. Ok sequel, nothing really wrong with it. The second one wasn’t watchable, but at least they’re not trying to replace the originals.