I would argue that there’s also lots of professionals who don’t use or need those features. Not everyone is using photoshop for print work, which that link seems to mostly discuss. It is still true, though, and every time I try to switch away from photoshop I run into some niche missing feature I need that most people wouldn’t care about.
NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 months ago
For a real Photoshop vs GIMP discussion, I think I’ll leave a link to Franklin Veaux’s Quora post here.
tl;dr there is actually a lot of functionality in Photoshop not present in GIMP that most casual users will never use, but is very important to professionals. People don’t pay hundreds of dollars to Adobe just for funsies.
Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org 5 months ago
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 5 months ago
There’s a ton of functionality in Photoshop that even pros never use. Every user of Photoshop needs something different from it. Sure, there’s a core of features that everyone uses (and which the Gimp also has) but there’s also countless other niche features that are a crucial part of the workflow for tons of users and they won’t give them up. This is one of the reasons Photoshop is so hard to replace.
It’s also the reason Latex is tough to replace as well. It’s a phenomenon which is not limited to commercial software, that’s for sure.
Forester@yiffit.net 5 months ago
They do it because there really isn’t much of an alternative for substance painter…
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
Also the UX difference is worth the money alone.
NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I’m pretty sure there’s a GIMP plugin that does that if that is all you care about
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
To redo the entire UI?