Comment on Why Toyota Is Intentionally "Falling Behind" On EVs | Morning Brew (10:10)

<- View Parent
Oddbin@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Aviation is likely to be serviced by batteries or hydrogen for short to medium flights. Long haul and cargo is likely to remain fossil fuel based for quite a while due to the nature of the fuel caution uses. If you had said shipping you might have had a point, they can burn near enough anything but they seem to be trending towards something like ammonia.

What do you want me to say other than Google it for recycling? It’s widely known and has been for quite a while now. Unless you’re actively looking for the opposite you should have no trouble finding independent information rather than trusting some random on social medium. But here’s a few to set you off:

allenergysolar.com/…/solar-waste-myth-debunked/#:….

solarfast.co.uk/…/solar-energy-myths-debunked/

This one is from the energy saving trust, a non-profit government organisation and had a good round up of typical myths:

energysavingtrust.org.uk/myths-about-solar/

And here’s an excellent talk by a Dr who’s a specialist in the battery and energy storage arena:

youtu.be/tcJrUrp_Ygs

Incidentally if you actually want to learn more about this then Everything Electric is a good start.

Sustainable agriculture for food is one thing, to make fuel is something completely different and I think you know that but are being obstuse on purpose.

Look, I get it. You don’t like what you’re seeing, that doesn’t mean it’s wrong and it’s OK to change and adapt when presented with new information. The future is a mixture of technology that we have, are developing and haven’t even thought of. Biofuels may even have a small niche but that’s all it will be, a niche. Fully electric will be the dominant source of transport in the near future and batteries are going to make up the majority of that.

source
Sort:hotnewtop