It doesn’t. Graeber was an anthropologist and Wengrow is an archaeologist. It’s a review of existing evidence from past civilizations (the diversity of which most people are hugely ignorant about), making the case the most common representations of “civilization” and “progress” are severely limited, probably to a detrimental extent since we often can only base our conceptions of what is possible based on what we know.
Comment on Instagram Advertises Nonconsensual AI Nude Apps
DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 year agoWhat kind of economic system does the author of this book propose?
LostWon@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Unintentional Strawman misses the point.
A economy is but a subsystem to serve an organized society.
Not every society requires a economy there are many ways to organize, the original foundational ideas going back to ancient greece. Read up about them.
The people with wealth and power have all the insensitive to keep things as they are. They own the planets resources, the means of productions. They lobby or laws.
To think were waiting on one person to have “a better idea” for things to change is incredibly naive.
I don’t know how the system will change how the next one will look but the current one is mathematically not sustainable for another century.