Comment on Why is the consumption of Meat considered bad
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
animals are fed parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. all of the studies about the ecological impacts ignore this fact and then attribute the water used to produce, say, cotton to beef.
fkn@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No… No… The studies account for that. Most cattle in the US are fed human quality base ingredient feed… It’s much cheaper to feed them corn meal than anything else. (I say base ingredient because the standard on cattle feed as a whole is not human grade, but the bulk of the food, the corn, could be human grade if it had been processed for humans instead of cattle.)
The water numbers are pretty well understood.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
show me one study that accounts for that.
fkn@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I read your other post using poor and nemeck and even that article shows it.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
if you can cite where in that article it gives credit to cattle for conserving water that would be wasted, I would eat my hat.
WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not trying to be a dick here, but do you honestly think that you, a non-expert who likely doesn’t even practice in ecology or environmental sciences, are the authority here on whether any studies have attempted to account for the water consumption based on the feed variety and sources?
Because if you thought of it as a way to shoot down a random internet comment, then the experts who work in the field have certainly done so and followed through with those calculations already. Have you ever met a professor? They fucking love to tear apart arguments because it gets their names into publications and that’s how they earn tenure and notoriety for grant funding.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
you have no idea what my background is. this is just an appeal to authority.