Right… so your issue isn’t with the facts as they are stated. You too are not disputing those facts, am i right?
Comment on CFCs
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 year agoI’m disputing the confidence with which you people assert your secondhand truths and persecute unbelievers. You are behaving like cattle, herded by a glowing screen.
Bigmouse@lemmy.world 1 year ago
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Gee, nobody can accuse you of overlooking the obvious.
Bigmouse@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Thanks, i am putting effort into that.
EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The vast majority of scientists who are experts in the field, all across the globe, all looking at the data, providing their evidence to each other to either challenge or support, all agreeing on what’s happening.
It’s not being a sheep to look at this and realize that what that group is saying is probably right and that you, as a layman, should probably accept what they are saying. That’s actually the opposite of being a sheep, it’s being objective and reasonable.
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yes, in the ideal world, the sheepherders are wise friends and behaving as a sheep (let’s not quibble) is the winning strategy.
But I dislike sheep.
EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Unless you’re out doing the actual research yourself, like gathering the data, designing the studies, and then analyzing the results, you’re just a sheep too in the same exact way. You’re just making an irrational decision about which sheepherder to follow.
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
That’s definitely an option
Another option is a little of all three, marrying none.
Bigmouse@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Just a quick fyi, you are functionally a sollipsist. Please tell people that in the beginning, so they know not to waste their time
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Ow, my ego