Comment on Star Citizen 1.0 'Twinkles on the Horizon', Dev Says — 12 Years and $669 Million Later - IGN

• Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  See, the problem is that’s not a criticism for the people that play it. It’s playable now so why slap a 1.0 label on it until it’s ready. Real criticism would be something like ‘weapons in the shop are way too expensive’, ‘it takes way too long to get to my ship’, ‘server wipes are too extreme and I should be able to keep expensive ships’, ‘basic mechanics are not maintained and bug free enough between feature updates’ <- all criticism mine by the way.

  source

  • avater@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    what?

    source
  • GiveMemes@jlai.lu ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    You sound like me c. ARK survival evolved. You got hoodwinked dude, no reason to be ashamed. Sunk cost fallacy’s a bitch

    source

    • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Oh god, I have another space sim and lost $50. They got me bro. Why does this keep happening?

      source
• Cybersteel@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  Why are even playing if you didn’t like it

  source

  • Doof@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    This person is respond to someone saying of play it and you respond with why are you playing it… like really?

    source
  • avater@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Because for some time I still had hope that they can turn this into a somehow good game…

    source