By “it,” you meant the heavily redacted Epstein document? I think the disappointment was from people being allowed to remove themselves. Regardless of whose name would have been mentioned, aren’t you also disappointed that people taking part in human trafficking are, once again, getting away with it?
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I doubt you’ll find a single conservative who is pro human trafficking. Remember Republicans are the party that is against slavery.
tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 months ago
You forgot the /s
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Public education has failed you.
tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Understanding that political parties change over periods of time is part of a good education. Reliving the past to “own the libs” is pathetic. Get some new material.
fartington@lemm.ee 5 months ago
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 5 months ago
It was a funding bill not a bill making human trafficking illegal.
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Not hearing any disappointment in these docs getting redacted from conservatives.
So if anyone here is pro human trafficking, it’s you lot.
jimbolauski@lemm.ee 5 months ago
You probably haven’t been trolling long enough here to read comments about wanting all the evidence to be published.
Republicans have pulled the US out of slavery and segregation against the democrats will. I wish you would have had a better education but the dems have fought hard to hide that fact in public education.
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I wish you would have had a better education but the republicans have fought hard to twist the narrative.
npr.org/…/why-did-black-voters-flee-the-republica…