The problem. You cannot lie to an agent, but you can remain silent. Your also taking an action with a known consequence and an action that is not allowed.
Comment on U.S. Citizen Who Deleted Phone’s Data Says His Prosecution Puts Privacy at Risk
colournoun@beehaw.org 4 weeks agoMy understanding is that he is not the person who deleted the data, the agent did it by entering the pin. That’s an interesting wrinkle. Is that materially different than entering the wrong pin 10 times which often also wipes the device?
furrowsofar@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 weeks ago
I want to see the agent’s proof that he entered the pin correctly
balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Nah, it doesn’t change anything. The statute says
It’s clear that if he intended to wipe the phone and told the officer a password which would erase the contents, he “knowingly took an action for the purpose of preventing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody”.
slauraure@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
That’s why you write the duress pin on a note and “hide” it poorly inside the phone case.
balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Honestly yeah, that’s the best solution if you want to do something like this.
tracelr402@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
But it getting wiped didn’t impede them from taking the property into custody
balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Data contained on the phone is very much the property which they wanted to take into custody or control, and it was wiped.