Comment on Behold, "the whole story of Steam's economy in one picture": the top 1% of games earn 84.5% of estimated revenue, and most games barely make anything

<- View Parent
CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

Both of them.

Between 2003 (the launch of Steam on Windows) and 2013 (the launch of Steam on Linux) Microsoft acquired two game studios. Whereas in 2018 alone (the start of their acquisition spree) they acquired six.

Exactly, don’t use it

Well, I want to use it. There is no better game store with as many good deals, and that supports Linux.

Show me a game store that supports Linux with a good selection of games of modern and major game titles.

Also, Steam directly supports and funds a plethora of open source tools that benefit everyone.

My interests are in free, open source and decentralized platforms. What about yours?

Agreed, which is why I use Linux and support companies that also support Linux.

Making billions is a crime because there is no good way to do it

Billionares and corporations do not simply exist, they are built on the exploitation of others

You’re right about 99.99+% of cases. And I’m not defending Valve as some altruistic company. But lumping in Valve with the likes of Amazon, Oracle, Nvidia, Monsanto, Elon Musk, etc, simply on the amount of money they make is desingenous at best, but frankly is insane.

You’re one of those people that have a militant mindset when it comes to FOSS that gives open source a weird and bad reputation.

Open source literally cannot exist without companies using it to make money. The majority of funding for things like development of Linux itself comes directly from donations from for-profit companies.

Say “hi” to Tim Sweeney. Tell him Canada is just fine without him moving here.

Hell, the historically two largest distributions by install count (Ubuntu and Fedora) are developed and maintained by for-profit companies.

source
Sort:hotnewtop