Comment on LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins – Sean Carroll podcast w/Dr. Chandra Sripada

<- View Parent
TehPers@beehaw.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

Llm’s that only have one glyph per token can easily count this

[Citation needed]

There’s no difference between counting tokens containing the letter “r” and tokens solely representing the letter “r”. To begin with, this assumes the way we encode words in our brain is by tokenizing each letter, which we pretty much know to be false (we can process words without seeing evry ltr of th wrd and even think about them without it being mentioned).

yeah we train in bursts because it’s computationally cheaper, this hardly means anything important.

No, this is not how neural networks work at all.

We train in bursts because we need a ground truth/scoring function to guide the learning, which means we need a way to guide the model in the right direction. Even with unsupervised learning, the model has a way to determine whether it’s going in the right direction, like with GANs.

Neural networks are also incapable of synthesizing completely new skills from its own weights. Humans have been doing that for the entirety of human history.

source
Sort:hotnewtop