The BBC wrote a story that hurt them

The BBC’s editorial line is that humans are worthless, and that genocide is forgivable.

Reporting did not reinforce their world view

Any decent human should share the world view that genocide is a pressing matter.

They expected the BBC to be perfect and inevitable failures to meet that standard lead to disappointment

No one expects it to be perfect, but failure to meet expected standards means it’s unworthy of existing.

They found the style of reporting annoying

It’s laughable that you can use words like “annoying” when defending an organisation companioning for genocide. Their reporting isn’t annoying, it’s psychopathic and sickening.

Perhaps some reporters were annoying

Criminals. Enemies of mankind. Monsters. Some of their reporters are monsters.

A cynic might think that something deeper is going on, for example, a systematic campaign to erode trust in the BBC.

Perhaps this is a natural and uncoordinated response to the BBCs systematic campaign to make people value some human lives over others?

For me it, with all its failings, is one of the best public broadcasting organisations in the world.

I take it you regularly come across reporting from the others and find them wanting?