Comment on How did Google discover public links of Claude chats?
KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 3 days agoAh ok, looks like I didn’t read the article carefully enough.
That still leaves two scenarios though:
- Claude fucked up, and gave Google a way to index public links of people. After this news broke, they asked Google (and other search engines) to not show those urls anymore.
- People fucked up and/or fell victim to Google’s the data hunger, which let Google to index their public links, after which Claude asked Google not to index such links.
I guess, in the end, I’m mostly wondering if the long random strings of public links are generally “brute-force-discovered” by crawlers like Google, or whether “discovery” of such links requires some kind of breach.
SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Anthropic fucked up, Claude is not a person.
Correct, that seems to be the case.
Kind of. The user fuck up would be not realizing that Anthropic had no protections from search engines, and that by clicking “share” they were creating publicly accessible links.
Anthropic seems to have updated the domain those links are generated on so that crawlers do not index public chats, yes.
I am also curious. I looked it up. developers.google.com/search/…/how-search-works
If I had to guess based on this, Google had probably indexed the domain Claude or its frontend run on and automatically scooped up the public chats as they became available.
It is also possible that any Claude chat shared will still be accessible to web crawlers, if they just ignore the flags telling them not to scrape, crawl, access, index, etc.
KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Thank you this was very helpful.