Comment on Would an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?
We don’t have AI?
What year are you posting from?
We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
This sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so.
It’s not marketing, it’s the english language …cambridge.org/…/artificial-intelligence
With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
Fuck you too, shitbag.
It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.
SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 3 hours ago
We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz 2 hours ago
This sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so.
It’s not marketing, it’s the english language …cambridge.org/…/artificial-intelligence
With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 hour ago
Fuck you too, shitbag.
SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 hour ago
It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.