Comment on Would an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?

• SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s been an academic disciple since the 1950’s and a work in progress since at least Ada Lovelace.

  Calling AI a scam for idiots is fair enough: but please include writing, machines and computers there too.

  World class moron Linus Torvals on the matter 14 July 2026:

  ---

  “AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one.

  It may not have been that “clearly” even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today.”***

  source

  • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Dumb fuck.

    You want to know the difference?

    We have writing. We have machines. We have computers.

    We do not have AI.

    You are dangerously stupid.

    source

    • SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      We don’t have AI?

      What year are you posting from?

      source

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.

        source

        • -> View More Comments