Your whole comment was great but this part in particular cleared up things really well for me:
The only time that the current in the outlet while the transformer is connected would matter is if you were in series with the transformer.
While it’s obvious now that you mention it, I totally overlooked the fact that when people get shocked, they don’t come in contact with the circuit in a serial manner/configuration. This is probably why I calculated the values so overly simplistically, I think. Anyway, thanks! 😊
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Nope. Circuit breakers do not break on absolute current values. Ever. Period. At all. Even a basic spec sheet will inform you as much…
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Huh, TIL.
That doesn’t seem to be supported by my research. Standard breakers are designed to trip based on a function of over-current and time, but that doesn’t preclude any breakers from using current alone.
It won’t. I checked. A more detailed spec sheet will, but not a basic one.
They sure look like they are. The rating is the current that the breaker can sustain indefinitely at the reference temperature. And it sure looks like the EU rates the the same way.
Of course they can. You aren’t a ground fault. A load of 100mA on a GFCI is perfectly normal, and the same load will kill a human very quickly.
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
If you cannot understand the BASIC fact that a circuit breaker can ABSOLUTELY conduct more energy than its rating before it pops… then you are simply too stupid to understand what I said. Period. Absolutely. Good job being so dim.
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
They look like they are … to an ignorant incapable of reading comprehension. Which is one reason why the standards are made fun of.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Care to explain your reasoning, then? Or did you just want to feel smug?