Comment on China bans AI “boyfriends” and “girlfriends” over addiction and birth rate concerns
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 days agoIn this case, we have to look at the parents, how can you be so irresponsable that you need a government and a company to look after YOUR child?
SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
Everything can be true at same time ie that parents need to be more present (what capitalism helps to not be the case), that companies need to be made accountable for what happens in their platform (at tbey don’t want), and that governments in the interest of the betterment of all society need to preemptively avoid the worst scenarios of societal unhealthiness (prevention is cheaper than treatment). What I don’t understand is the willingness of Feddit to bend the knees to the man with money’s will instead of accomodate the collective will of all society through State policies.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 days ago
What does Feddit have to do with all this?
SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
You tell me.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 days ago
Uuh, what my country has to do with all that, again? Yep, our government is shit but i don’t see what they have to do here
Me? What i did? I don’t agree with your view of gettin childs lulled hy companies and governments instead of their parents?