Comment on What is negative voltage?

dextro@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

I think there’s a very physical but also intuitive way of thinking about this which eliminates all of the confusion (even with current conventions)

Forget about voltage and let me introduce potential Think about that as a landscape, its height changes and can be mapped in a height map. It corresponds to the „arbitrary energy level“ a particle on which a force may act. Imagine a ball on a curved hill: when ignoring friction and elasticity, the ball has contact with the plane at a singular point and will begin to roll down the hill. That’s what electrons do in a electric field (they rise to the top actually but you may think about current as „virtual“ positive particles which engineers do all the time. The „sea level“ is usually defined as 0V (the potential is also measured in volts)

Now the concept of voltage becomes nothing more than a height difference. In my opinion this beautifully explains concepts like Kirchhoffs voltage law: walk a circle on earths surface and measure your net height change… it’s always 0.

So to finally ( :D ) answer your question: a negative voltage is a negative height change

Also current conventions become less confusing, because there is something all scientists and engineers can agree on: a voltage source creates a hill and a valley in its electric potential, the hill is + and the valley -, engineers think about current as virtual positive charge which will move to -, scientists will think about it as electrons moving from - to +.

source
Sort:hotnewtop