Comment on Not a single one
LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week agoNothing, because they have only space for 6500 t high-level nuclear waste which is already reserved for Finnish nuclear waste, whereas Germany has like 17.000 t.
Comment on Not a single one
LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week agoNothing, because they have only space for 6500 t high-level nuclear waste which is already reserved for Finnish nuclear waste, whereas Germany has like 17.000 t.
crimson_iris@piefed.social 1 week ago
But with regards to the “no such thing as safe long term storage” comment?
LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 1 week ago
Now I get what you mean. I should have phrased this better. I meant “no such thing as safe long term storage [could be determined in Germany yet]”. Which means, as of today, they could not find a safe location in Germany to build such a storage facility like Finland did.
Germany is densely populated and the ground/earth is mostly unsuited for long time storage.