Oh, I’m not implying you didn’t read the book. That part is extremely obvious. I’m implying that you didn’t even bother skimming the wikipedia article.
Not really sure what I can do with that. Maybe you’ll be better off wallowing?
Oh, I’m not implying you didn’t read the book. That part is extremely obvious. I’m implying that you didn’t even bother skimming the wikipedia article.
Not really sure what I can do with that. Maybe you’ll be better off wallowing?
Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I read the wiki, I read reddit discussions, I’ve skimmed other essays. I still hold my claims. What do you think I’m missing? I don’t wallow in dispair, you act like I have a choice when it is the farthest from the truth. The only reason I have any remote ammount if happiness is that I broke the boulder. Sisyphus is a bitch.
impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Then it’s a problem of reading comprehension, because absurdism is not that. Absurdism is finding joy in action.
Go wallow in your misery then.
Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Read just fine. I’m glad you find joy on action. For me action causes lots of pain due disability. So I must be selective with action. When you find no joy in action because every action brings you pain, it is very difficult to be happy in the struggle. The actions I do, like responding to you, have meaning becausey literal blood is within them. But there is no joy. I only feel joy something finally eases the pain. I’m sorry your philosophy did not hold against this human.