People who don’t have that reflex are few enough that its absence can be considered an anomaly. If humans are God’s design, the existence of a self-preservation reflex like this sets a precedent.
it’s weird that God determined accidental burns are bad enough that it’s worth taking away our free will to prevent them, but heinous crimes like paedophilia aren’t.
This isn’t a defense of your position, read: claim, which was about one man. To assume the royal we after the claim is fallacious and changing scope. You cannot claim one as all if I cannot claim one as one. Exception break rules. Besides, there is no god.
sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Depends on the set.
plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
People who don’t have that reflex are few enough that its absence can be considered an anomaly. If humans are God’s design, the existence of a self-preservation reflex like this sets a precedent.
it’s weird that God determined accidental burns are bad enough that it’s worth taking away our free will to prevent them, but heinous crimes like paedophilia aren’t.
sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
This isn’t a defense of your position, read: claim, which was about one man. To assume the royal we after the claim is fallacious and changing scope. You cannot claim one as all if I cannot claim one as one. Exception break rules. Besides, there is no god.