Comment

Good luck with that - but entirely unrealistic. You have to deal with the demographics as they are and not with them at some arbitrary point in the past.

After you’ve solved Palistine are you going to have a crack at unwinding the effects of colonialism around the rest of the world?

source

Sort:hotnew top

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
And a genocidal expansionist Apartheid around the corner is realistic? Like keeping Nazi Germany around the corner after 1945. Surely that can’t go wrong. Your idea is much less realistic than mine.

source
- ramble81@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  There’s idealistic and then there’s pragmatic. Following that logic, what are you going to do about lands stolen from Native Americans, or anything as a result of colonialism? “Give them back!” you say. Which may be done idealistically, but in the US for example, where does the other population of 330 Million people go?
  
  You’re basically advocating for genocide in a different way with a different winner. That’s not a sustainable or realistic outcome.
  
  source
  - geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    You’re basically advocating for genocide in a different way with a different winner. That’s not a sustainable or realistic outcome.
    
    Oh god not a “reverse genocide” apologist.
    
    source
    ramble81@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    The natives struck a deal with the US
    
    Deals under duress are no deals at all. Ever read about the Trail of Tears. Tell me now that was a deal that was in good faith by both sides.
    
    Sounds like you just like the idea of killing people.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments