Comment

arm is much more proprietary and less open than Intel

That is exactly backwards. How many companies are licensed to make Intel/AMD comparable CPUs? 4? 6? How many for Arm? Hundreds of companies (Apple, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc.).

source

Sort:hotnew top

Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
I am not referring to the chips themselves, but to the ecosystem around and the more often than not unlockable bootloaders and lack of something like bios or UEFI. Even on UEFI you can disable Microsoft keys and install yours, at least on decent ones.

But yes, arm is an easier to reproduce architecture at this time, chip side at least

source
- CallMeAl@piefed.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  It seems like you are mixing up the “ecosystem” with the application: desktop, mobile phone, etc.
  
  10 years ago there were mobile phones running Intel Atom and they were just as bootlocked as any other phone. I personally have two intel based chromebooks and unlocking their bootloader requires taking them apart.
  
  Whereas my arm based Pinebook Pro requires no unlock at all. I have lots of Arm based SBCs and all of them came unlocked as well.
  
  source
  - Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    Then, I stand corrected …
    
    Thank you
    
    source