AFAIK you can only encrypt the connection to the AI and promise to not keep any logs, but the AI needs to ingest readable data. So whomever owns the hardware can see what’s being fed into it. Yeah you can mix instances and chat history and not link the requests to any one person but it will never be completely private.
Comment on Why aren't non-selfhosed AI models/apps private?
Steve@communick.news 2 weeks ago
There is no real technical reason. They could be. It’s just a matter of encryption while in transit and no logs. Proton does it.
The real reason they aren’t, is that there’s not much incentive to make them private. The data is somewhat valuable, so hold on to it.
Sebeck012@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
Steve@communick.news 2 weeks ago
Yes. All that’s true. If you’re using a 3rd party AI engine.
That’s why Proton is running their own, in house.
acido@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
Proton allegedly does it.
It’s all just advertising, until you get the hard evidence.
Steve@communick.news 2 weeks ago
Most modern legal systems today presume innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
Proton is structured entirely unlike any other tech company. It would entirely against their own self interests to lie about their privacy claims. Their entire reputation is built on it.
acido@feddit.it 2 weeks ago
welcome to the real world, where corporations lie.
Steve@communick.news 2 weeks ago
Not the real world. Just your imagination.
Corporations lie for profit. Where’s the profit for Proton in keeping peoples AI queries, when they’ve been proven not keep any other data? Literally they have nothing to gain, and everything to loose.
Skepticism and pessimism aren’t the same thing. And baseless pessimism is the dark equivalent of naivety. They’re both equally ignorant.
artyom@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
That’s because guilty people in the legal system get put in cages.