Comment on For the love of god make this happen

• Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s literally Oakhaka

  source

  • zeppo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “Literally” as in… what is that supposed to mean? In Spain? Nobody pronounces it like that.

    source

    • Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It doesn’t mean anything in Spanish because it’s not a Spanish word in origin, idiot

      source

      • zeppo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Here, as a scholar you’ll appreciate this.

        Nahuatl word “Huaxyacac” [waːʃ.ˈja.kak] was transliterated as “Oaxaca” using Medieval Spanish orthography, in which the x represented the voiceless postalveolar fricative ([ʃ], the equivalent of English sh in “shop”), making “Oaxaca” pronounced as [waˈʃaka]. However, during the sixteenth century the voiceless fricative sound evolved into a voiceless velar fricative ([x], like the ch in Scottish “loch”), and Oaxaca began to be pronounced [waˈxaka].

        In present-day Spanish, Oaxaca is pronounced [waˈxaka] or [waˈhaka], the latter pronunciation used mostly in dialects of southern Mexico, the Caribbean, much of Central America, some places in South America, and the Canary Islands and western Andalusia in Spain where [x] has become a voiceless glottal fricative ([h]).

        The last part explains the different pronunciation of X from what you’re saying.

        source
      • zeppo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Huh? Nobody said anything about a meaning. Thanks for the tips.

        source