Comment on [deleted]
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoNo, entirely apples and oranges. Like not even close. If your argument was about encyclopedias vs Wikipedia then you would have a point.
Comment on [deleted]
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoNo, entirely apples and oranges. Like not even close. If your argument was about encyclopedias vs Wikipedia then you would have a point.
rabiezaater@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
What did people use for knowledge before libraries? Elders, right?
What did people use for retrieving knowledge before AI? Wikipedia/Google. Before that? Libraries.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Jesus christ. Are you an ai? You should look up what a false equivalence is. Ai is making people more stupid, you don’t gain knowledge from ai.
rabiezaater@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
If that’s the case, then why did you bring up wikipedia vs encycopedias? You’re losing me bud.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Because that is an example of a pertinent argument