Comment on How possibly?

<- View Parent
TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

But let’s not give 'em a head start by using words that consistently turn off our audience, eh? In my experience, “privilege” and “toxic masculinity” do just that.

Because the well funded rightwing think tanks have already started them…

people using “evil homosexuals” don’t need to add the “evil,” because they’re bigots who believe that homosexuality is evil. Likewise, the people who use “toxic masculinity” don’t need to add the “toxic,” because they’re bigots who believe that masculinity is toxic.

I use toxic masculinity and I don’t think masculinity is inherently toxic?

And I don’t think a significant amount of people think masculinity by itself is toxic by itself. Otherwise everyone would be force femming their husbands, or hating any trans men choosing to express themselves.

The only people who seem to be interpreting toxic masculinity as an implication of masculinity as a whole are people who seem to think all maledom is under siege.

source
Sort:hotnewtop