Comment on Dumb glasses
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 hours agoUsing “nearby glasses” set to 20m to detect the glasses’ Bluetooth signature (plan on making that a module I can attach to the front doorframe), I can easily detect the presence of your classes. Then, you shall have two options after I speak to you. Surrender the glasses, or speak to my personal attorney. Or if I’m not at home, my drone, which will ram into your face to destroy the glasses.
lumen@feddit.nl 8 hours ago
I don’t appreciate the threat of violence. I won’t surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you.
matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
Let’s say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don’t want creeps to record them secretly. You’re still confident in your odds?
tjsauce@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
You really want these glasses, don’t you? You’re smart enough to debate the hypothetical, but miss the obvious point that new things will not be regulated as they should be, so the law doesn’t function as it should in this situation. You cling tightly to the law as if it’s doing what it’s meant to do, when we both know you’d be taking advantage of the lack of laws for no clear benefit.
lumen@feddit.nl 8 hours ago
What?
tjsauce@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
What part didn’t you understand?
athatet@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
Actually insufferable.
Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 8 hours ago
Fucking idiot says wat?