Who made this social contract? I certainly didn’t. You want to be able to tell everyone else what the social contract is, and assault them if they don’t comply.
Fascist.
Comment on Dumb glasses
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours agoA clear violation of the social contract deserves a swift response. Those glasses come off your face, and onto the pavement.
FishFace@piefed.social 8 hours ago
matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
When you say “fascist”, you do realize that fascism involves crowd control and these glasses are a dream for a fascist regime? All the speech about “cameras everywhere is ok” falls right in the authoritarianism thinking, that’s just a step from fascism.
jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
This account ^ is going very far out of its way to make very bad points and overlook obvious gaping privacy violations, which are things that can be both identified and stopped.
The takeaway of massively privacy invading glasses is they can always be stopped at both the individual and the systemic level.
lumen@feddit.nl 10 hours ago
No they don’t. I might actually go film on the sidewalk just outside your home, and there would be nothing at all you can do about it.
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours ago
Using “nearby glasses” set to 20m to detect the glasses’ Bluetooth signature (plan on making that a module I can attach to the front doorframe), I can easily detect the presence of your classes. Then, you shall have two options after I speak to you. Surrender the glasses, or speak to my personal attorney. Or if I’m not at home, my drone, which will ram into your face to destroy the glasses.
lumen@feddit.nl 10 hours ago
I don’t appreciate the threat of violence. I won’t surrender my property to you, you will not destroy my property, you will not hurt me without me defending myself, and your attorney will not bend the law for you.
tjsauce@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
You really want these glasses, don’t you? You’re smart enough to debate the hypothetical, but miss the obvious point that new things will not be regulated as they should be, so the law doesn’t function as it should in this situation. You cling tightly to the law as if it’s doing what it’s meant to do, when we both know you’d be taking advantage of the lack of laws for no clear benefit.
matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Let’s say hypothetically that he assaults you, you sue him, then he raises 200k$ for his defense through crowdfunding because I bet the majority of people don’t want creeps to record them secretly. You’re still confident in your odds?
Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
Fucking idiot says wat?
nile_istic@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I think the real problem is that you don’t seem to realize/care how gross and rapey you sound. That’s… maybe something to work on.
xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
This may be perfectly legal but it is absolutely a dick move and people will HATE you for it. The are so many scenarios where perfectly reasonable people will find this behavior extremely unsettling, at best, and possibly threatening.
And you are incorrect in assuming that “there would be nothing [the subject] can do about it “. In the real world there are plenty of people who will risk an assault charge to deal with someone being a disrespectful dick, and many more who will act if they feel threatened.
Now, might doesn’t make right, but are you right? Going against social norms and risking extrajudicial retaliation to fight injustice is commendable. But this isn’t sitting at a lunch counter during segregation or protesting at Stonewall. In a world where 1 in 3 women will be stalked in her lifetime ( in the US according to the Justice Department), why is this the hill you want to die upon?