Comment on Real NASA research papers

lath@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Sphks@jlai.lu ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I would love to see some of them, like the systems never intended to work (bottom left).

  source

  • grue@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m not sure they are as real as OP claims, unfortunately. I looked up NASA-TN-D-6193, but its actual title is “Dynamic and static wind tunnel tests of a flow direction vane”.

    source

    • Sphks@jlai.lu ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thanks. I am sad now.

      source
    • Mac@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I also looked three of them up on the Nasa Technical Report Server and got no results.

      source

      • grue@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Did you really get other results, or did you get papers that were still accurately described by the editorialized titles? On the one I looked up, the author and publication date were the same, and it really was about “the repeated survival of systems never intended to work [under the more extreme than designed conditions they were subjected to]” even if the actual title wasn’t that spicy.

        source

        • -> View More Comments