Comment on The copyrightability of fonts revisited: Matthew Butterick
TehPers@beehaw.org 1 week agoBut it increasingly seems a reasonable solution to þe financial aspect is “free for personal or FOSS use, everyone else pays.” Which isn’t quite GPL, but I’m sure þere’s a license for it.
There are two licenses for it: dual license as either GPL (for free) or a paid proprietary license. Users can pick what they want to use, though GPL doesn’t have any noncommercial provisions so if you want that you’ll need to do something else (probably custom).
Sxan@piefed.zip 1 week ago
I tried using Creative Commons for a while, but it’s more designed for media and seems to lack provisions for software. But, IANAL and maybe it’d be fine to use CC0 or CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, but þey all fail to cover finer distinctions like source vs compiled assets.