Comment on X could be banned in UK amid sexualised AI images concerns

• FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  As far as I understand (going from what was reported on this in the last couple of days) Grok’s ability to create porn is recent, so that explains that.

  I don’t use it, but my impression was that, Grok aside, the content is primarily not porn, which would make it not a porn site, surely.

  source

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Twitter has always hosted a considerable amount of porn GROK being deliberately developed into a CSAM machine is just the most recent thing.

    To be clear, Twitter (and now X) explicitly permit pornographic content by policy:

    https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/adult-content

    It is a porn site. Not a site that sometimes people break the rules and post porn to. It is a site that deliberately and intentional hosts pornography.

    source

    • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Fair enough. But it also (I just checked) requires age verification like regular porn sites, so I don’t really get the raising of the treatment of twitter as some kind of double standard.

      source

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        They ARE NOT being subjected to the same age verification process as regular porn sites. That is the entire thing that we are talking about here.

        source

        • -> View More Comments