Comment on I dunno
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 6 days agoIf you can simplify before distributing - and the PDFs you spam say you can
They say you can do that when there is Addition or Subtraction inside the Brackets. They also say you cannot Distribute over Multiplication, at all
then there is no difference
There is no difference between Addition and Multiplication?? 😂
You made it the fuck up
And yet, there it is in textbooks that were written before I was even born 😂
2(n)2 is 2n2 whether n=a+b or n=a*b=ab
Nope! a(b+c)=(ab+ac). a(bxc)=abc
If you want to square the 2, that’s (2n)2.
…or 2²xn², or 2(½n+½n)²
It’s not about the multiply sign, or grouping, or division
Yes it is! 😂 If there’s a Multiply or a Divide, you cannot Distribute.
You fooled yourself into saying 2=1
Not me! 😂
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Every textbook with an answer key says you’re full of shit.
Physical calculators say you’re full of shit.
Advanced math programs say you’re full of shit.
You can keep talking, but you’re obviously just full of shit.
At some point you’re either so deep in denial you should speak Swahili, or else being wrong on purpose is the point. The answer in either case is shut the fuck up.
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 6 days ago
Says person who can’t find a Maths textbook that says a(bxc)=(abxac) 🙄
I’m gonna presume that’s why you keep claiming a(bxc)=(abxac) 🙄
says person still not doing that 😂
No it isn’t! 😂 2xn² is
Except for authors of Maths textbooks 😂
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
So no answer for centuries of textbooks saying you’re full of shit.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
b*c is one term.
Show me one textbook where a(b+c)^2^ gets an a^2^ term. Here’s four in a row that say you’re full of shit.
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 6 days ago
No it isn’t! 😂
Image
says person who just proved they’re full of shit about what constitutes a Term 😂