Comment

Being part of the racket has nothing to do with it. It could be an advert for anarcho-communists and it would still be an advert.

I specifically said I have no problem with it. But a signature is still a form of advertising and there was a complaint that it wasn’t shown, which I just thought was funny considering the premise.

I think it should be the norm to display a discrete signature on comics. I just thought it was a funny comment in this specific scenario.

What a way to kill the fun.

source

Sort:hotnew top

arsCynic@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
“Advertisement: a public notice
especially : a paid notice that is published or broadcast (as to attract customers or to provide information of public interest)” ―https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/advertisement

Do you think Clay Butler pays to have his cartoons published?

“What a way to kill the fun.”

But, where does killing the fun start exactly? Isn’t it you who first expressed the contrarian opinion? Surely you must expect people to refute your claims, or at the very least some pushback.

source
- Zombie@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Image
  
  source
  - arsCynic@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Ad hominem. Bye.
    
    source