If we’re talking about the same thing, then afaik their whole claim is that we aren’t in a simulation, because we have true randomness which can’t be created in software. But it’s not necessary to create true randomness in software to have it in said software.
Although I haven’t read the full paper, and am going off what people wrote about it in comments.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
That having true randomness in machines means the study is debunked?
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If we’re talking about the same thing, then afaik their whole claim is that we aren’t in a simulation, because we have true randomness which can’t be created in software. But it’s not necessary to create true randomness in software to have it in said software.
Although I haven’t read the full paper, and am going off what people wrote about it in comments.
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
If you haven’t read it. Why should I trust your opinion?
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Then don’t trust it, what the fuck is it to me.