Comment on Reddit and Kick added to child social media ban
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
I wish we could just regulate algorithmic recommendation and make companies over a certain size liable for content they promote (like publishing houses are) instead.
I am really concerned that this will do nothing to stop general social degradation and may actually cement the power of large operators by making smaller companies of ambiguous status legally risky; also pushing children to engage with hellscape platforms like 4chan or platforms run by other states Australia has less ability to regulate.
Also it’s a fucking privacy nightmare, but I’m aware that us tinhatters are alone in our damn Cassandra complexes as everything we’ve warned about happens over and over again.
This. If I was designing the social media ban I’d have 3 rules:
melbaboutown@aussie.zone 19 hours ago
This.
I saw somewhere the ecommissioner said they’re getting to 4chan and they’ll deal with it in the second wave based on objectionable content, but I’m not sure what the outcome will be. 4chan and Kiwifarms are suing.
Also there’s stuff like unmoderated Minecraft servers and Roblox.
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
There’s so many. I was there 2000 years ago when we just hung out on IRCs and xmpp.
If you actually dig into the studies a lot of the excessive socmed time of kids is chatting. what we used to do with MSN and shite.
Kids will find a way to hang out and share stuff. Probably better that it happens in the light.
I am reminded of older attitudes towards sex and teens. Preventing kids from being open about their sexual activities didn’t make it safe, it meant that people fucked in filthy places and didn’t have a proper education, or made friends with someone seedy as to get porn.
We should provide safe® alternatives, not ban things and then pretend that bored teenagers aren’t some of the most creative people on the planet.