Comment on Adobe tells you to use Chrome, not Firefox
Presi300@lemmy.world 1 year agoWhat does evangelism have to do with blatant monopolistic anti-consumer practices being forced on users?
Why do I have to switch out Firefox, which CAN run anything that chrome can, just because some bullshit company said so.
It’s a blatant anti-consumer practice, that is becoming more and more common, just because Firefox can still block ads, while chrome cannot. It’s bullshit and more people need to talk about it.
soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 1 year ago
Meanwhile, Mozilla refuses to implement feature parity with chromium in certain places they seem to be too invasive.
Also, chromium browsers can block ads.
Presi300@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Tell me 1 area where firefox isn’t at feature parity with chrome, unless you’re referring to mozilla choosing to not drop manifest V2 (which is a feature that chrome doesn’t have… fully functional adblockers and all) and by chrome, i mean chrome. 90% of people don’t use chromium-based browsers, they use chrome, so I think it’s more fair to compare firefox to chrome, instead of any of the chromium-based browsers.
egerlach@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
There’s the topic of this conversation, WebUSB. I happen to believe that a missing feature here for Firefox is a good thing, mind you…
Presi300@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I had never even heard of it before and upon looking it up… I struggle to grasp why any web app, website or anything on the internet would ever need access to my USB devices, isn’t USB device management the OS’s job? Like, call me stupid here, but I see no genuine use case for this.