Some fraction of the harm they do is by carelessness rather than malice. That some mindless algorithm intended to find and exploit for advertising purposes the posts that got the most engagement disproportionately selected ones featuring images of cute teenagers does not seem unlikely.
Comment on Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man
snooggums@piefed.world 3 days agoThey have thousands of employees who discuss and make decisions before anything changes. Everything Meta does is intentional.
kbal@fedia.io 3 days ago
ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 2 days ago
They’ve intentionally maliciously set up systems where “carelessness” leads to these malicious outcomes.
It’s not fail safe, nor fail secure. It’s fail evil.
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 days ago
I don’t think we can apply Hanlon to anything Meta does.
snooggums@piefed.world 3 days ago
They have been doing it long enough to know that happens.
verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I’m going to assume this is Meta’s usual level of negligent greed, and there’s a decent chance that no human was involved. YouTube actually did something very similar.