Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records
gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 1 day agodo you remember the part where I said I’m not an expert, not invested or care about sport?
Who has the energy to care? assuming you’re a seppo, your country has a shit tonne more to worry about than how good someone’s chromosomes make them at putting a hockey stick in a basket from the other end of the pool
Who has the energy to care? assuming you’re a seppo, your country has a shit tonne more to worry about than how good someone’s chromosomes make them at putting a hockey stick in a basket from the other end of the pool
Yet here you are, caring.
Not american, and that is a pathetic way to try and kill a discussion. Just because something more important might be happening everything else should be ignored?
Yet here you are, caring.
I’m waiting for code to compile if I’m being honest
Still here caring I see.
I clock off in half an hour
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
You unironically posted John Oliver and expected people to take it seriously lol
gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 1 day ago
that is a pathetic way to try and kill a discussion, especially when your source was repeating conservative echo chamber nonsense and the section of the video I linked was literally talking about your stats, in a clear concise manner, something your article never took the time to do
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 23 hours ago
It’s John Oliver, a “progressive” shill (who is supposed to be a comedian lol) who is just a propaganda mouthpiece. If I posted a video of Joe Rogan talking about trans women and all the physical advantages they retain forever would you watch it and think it’s a good source? Somehow I don’t think so. Being “clear and concise” doesn’t change the fact that he’s a biased bullshit artist.
gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 23 hours ago
If Joe Rogan was researched and prepared instead of what he says off the cuff with his room temperature IQ, old mate can’t even read a graph, maybe he’d have some credibility.
Oliver’s team have given him the references to support what he’s saying, you not liking him doesn’t change the contents of the report you referenced