That's not how human rights work. Either they're for everyone or they're for no one.
censoring white supremacists and paedophiles is good actually.
artyom@piefed.social 2 months ago
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
you don't have a human right to be sexually attracted to kids or want to kill minorities.........
artyom@piefed.social 2 months ago
Good thing no one was talking about that. We were talking about freedom of speech.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
ok but "freedom of speech" is an american thing.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
I actually sometimes use 4chan, if that’s what you think it is then you’re frankly pretty deluded & again these laws are dangerous and will eventually be turned on something you support. You are falling hook line and sinker for ye olde “think of the kids” line that the political class roll out for authoritarian surveillance legislation.Image
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
But they’re not censoring 4chan because they’re white supremacist, they’re censoring them because of consensual adult material.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
consensual and 4chan should not be in the same sentence given their history.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Same can be said for: reddit, facebook, xitter, myspace, tumblr etc etc etc.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
sure, agreed; social is largely trash
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
True, but the UK doesn’t care if it’s consensual or not.