That's not how human rights work. Either they're for everyone or they're for no one.
censoring white supremacists and paedophiles is good actually.
artyom@piefed.social 4 days ago
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
you don't have a human right to be sexually attracted to kids or want to kill minorities.........
artyom@piefed.social 4 days ago
Good thing no one was talking about that. We were talking about freedom of speech.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
ok but "freedom of speech" is an american thing.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
I actually sometimes use 4chan, if that’s what you think it is then you’re frankly pretty deluded & again these laws are dangerous and will eventually be turned on something you support. You are falling hook line and sinker for ye olde “think of the kids” line that the political class roll out for authoritarian surveillance legislation.Image
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
But they’re not censoring 4chan because they’re white supremacist, they’re censoring them because of consensual adult material.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
consensual and 4chan should not be in the same sentence given their history.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Same can be said for: reddit, facebook, xitter, myspace, tumblr etc etc etc.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
sure, agreed; social is largely trash
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
True, but the UK doesn’t care if it’s consensual or not.