Comment on Socialism
morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
Under socialism your needs would be met such that you didn’t need money
But go ahead and continue to be a beta worker with stockholm syndrome since you enjoy it so much
Comment on Socialism
morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
Under socialism your needs would be met such that you didn’t need money
But go ahead and continue to be a beta worker with stockholm syndrome since you enjoy it so much
Lovstuhagen@hilariouschaos.com 1 week ago
To be entirely fair, it didn’t work out that way in the USSR or China very well at the lows of communism, and it was as they eased up and allowed less communistic policies that the situation improved.
morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 week ago
A regime referring to itself as socialist doesn’t make it so.
If a con man told you they were honest, would you believe them?
Also China is, like you say, communist, and thus irrelevant.
Lovstuhagen@hilariouschaos.com 1 week ago
I have a simple policy on this… I let people define their own terms. I just do not really like debates about semantics enough… Plus I believe especially that If I am not X, I do not have that much of a right to define what X is or isn’t. I only safeguard against absurdities.
In terms of this, though, I am sympathetic to the idea that the USSR, Communist China, Communist Vietnam, etc., were Communist since many sincere people attempted to make Communism work there.
Is Communism different from socialism? Certainly. And I respect those differences. But it also makes sense to come to conclusions based off of the extreme socialist models about socialism, IMO.