We can change anything, and if it makes society a better place then we actually have a moral obligation to try

The problem is that “better” in the context of society is usually subjective. We’re talking about a form of censorship, for which change in a positive direction is very complicated at best.

Lawmakers in the US want people to think that ISPs taking responsibility for pirates on their network is a change for a “better” society, for example. Or that net neutrality is unfair to businesses and would result in a “better” society if abolished.

The truth is that it’s a ploy to gather unprecedented amounts of data on citizens hiding behind a “won’t they think of the children” moral take.