Comment on In New York City, Drivers Who Run Red Lights Get Tickets. E-Bike Riders Get Court Dates.

<- View Parent
LilB0kChoy@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

The article doesn’t describe a “biker problem” though. It specifically is talking about e-bikes and electric scooters.

It follows actions by city officials from Paris to Honolulu to Hoboken, N.J., who are responding to residents angry about zippy vehicles with silent electric motors zooming down sidewalks and streets, often startling people, and occasionally hitting pedestrians.

A manually powered bicycle or scooter is a lot different from an electric powered version capable of 20-30mph.

Unfair treatment of one group versus another isn’t right and more cycle friendly infrastructure is needed but do you put both regular and e-bikes on that infrastructure to share it? Wouldn’t that lead to a lot of the same complaints that sharing with cars currently generates?

I do think you’re right that it’s not all of any one of these groups (cyclists or motorists) that are problematic; we just notice the ones that are problematic the most. That said, cyclists are the minority which means they need “imperfect allies” of motorists to drive the change that leads to more, better cycling infrastructure.

I don’t know the best way to go about that but ignoring the laws you’re required to follow isn’t a great way to go about it. I’d propose instead that working to change the rules for cyclists so that they aren’t bound by the “one way” and are allowed to legally proceed through a red as long as they can safely do so (no opposing traffic at the light/stop, they’ve stopped and confirmed it’s safe to proceed) and so on would be good. Then it might incentivize some motorists to ditch their car so they can get around easier as well as improve the experience for current cyclists.

All of this is assuming the traffic laws in NYC work similar to where I am.

source
Sort:hotnewtop